Greed and Selfishness
Interpreters of “As He Plucked Them” reimagine the song in a set of meanings that revive its central themes, greed and selfishness, within different and current contexts. Like the song’s original performers, who demonstrated the composition’s potential as a tool for enacting salient political change, many interpreters articulate the importance of responsibility and loyalty in leadership, reckoning with personal complexes like self-centeredness. Through a diversity of commentaries and perspectives, they reflect on the current moment and illuminate new truths. Rather than looking at the meaning of the lyrics of “As He Plucked Them” literally, Jimmy Ssenfuka Kibirige views the song as an apt tool for reflecting on the greed of contemporary leaders.
The song is a representation of leaders who use their position as an opportunity to serve themselves rather than the people they lead. They take the power people grant them and use it to benefit themselves. They embrace greed, selfishness, and short-sightedness. Rather than planning carefully and establishing goodwill among the people for subsequent elections, they use their time in office for personal pleasures. When the time comes for reelection, they scramble to secure the support of the people they ignored for the entirety of their terms, begging for votes for fear of losing their treasured leadership positions.
1Kibirige interview, December 15, 2019.As a criticism of politicians who forget their responsibility to the people who bestow power upon them, Kibirige’s reading of “As He Plucked Them” reminds us that some leaders may become blinded by their own power, ignoring the responsibilities that accompany it:
Such leaders should remember that no leadership position is permanent and that their positions will not sustain them for life. As such, they should remember that their duty is to serve and should give others the same opportunity. Losing their positions is inevitable; therefore, they should spend their time in office establishing protocols that will ensure the success of the people and future leaders.
2Ibid.Harriet Kisuule demonstrates how “As He Plucked Them” can expose the lack of transparency of many leaders during and after their election campaigns:
Leaders often gain the vote of the people by making specific promises during elections, only to fail to fulfill those promises by the time their term is over. In doing this, such leaders deprive the people of what they promised them, and thus fail their responsibility to the people. One can say the same for autocracy, where dictatorial leaders pose an obstacle to their people’s prosperity. Autocratic leaders isolate themselves from the people and remain unconcerned about the well-being of their subjects. To use the language of the song “As He Plucked Them,” they eat all of the grasshoppers alone. For instance, President Museveni remains isolated from others, gorging himself on grasshoppers. When the guerrilla war (the Ugandan Bush War) in Luweero ended and Museveni and Colonel Dr. Besigye (his private doctor during the war) rose to popularity, it seemed like they were one person. Quickly, however, Museveni turned against many of those who supported him, Besigye included, which is how he came to be Museveni’s opponent in later presidential races. The two now consider each other enemies. That, again, is the danger of autocracy: rulers pick and eat their grasshoppers alone, and thus only recognize a responsibility to themselves.
3Kisuule interview, December 21, 2019.Kisuule reveals here that the lyrics of “As He Plucked Them” imply how becoming a leader is laden with the seductive potential to overconsume and isolate himself. In this light, leaders must remain aware of their civic responsibilities.
Jessy Ssendawula further discusses the notion of responsibility and uses it to describe the current leadership’s methods for maintaining order and control:
The content of the song speaks to the attitude of the National Resistance Movement government, which uses the military and police to suppress all opposition, even if the dissidents’ actions are benefiting the country. If the opposition continues to threaten the government’s power, they will not hesitate to pluck them like grasshoppers. The song also serves as a warning to leaders to only take what they can consume and utilize. This is because it is unreasonable to expect the people not to eat whatever leftover grasshoppers remain themselves. Contemporary leaders need to recognize when they should let go. They should not force people to adopt their ideologies and work instead to convince them amicably. This is because ultimately, their fealty is to the people. Therefore, they should align their actions with the best interests of those people.
4Ssendawula interview, December 28, 2019.By comparing Kamaanya’s rule to the National Resistance Movement government, Ssendawula offers fresh interpretation on the idea of picking or plucking grasshoppers. Framing this metaphor as state political repression instead of individual greed may seem like a stretch, but it aligns with and reimagines previous interpretations of “As He Plucked Them,” giving it a new vitality that might allow contemporary listeners to familiarize themselves with the song’s history.
Shifting to a more individual framing, Peter Kinene explains how “As He Plucked Them” asks the listener not to forget their fellows when they achieve success, adding that this sentiment aligns with many Kiganda proverbs, including Akatono kazza omukwano (A small thing rekindles friendship or love) and Akatono okalya ne munno; bw’akwata enkukunyi, anyigira ku kinkumu (You eat a little thing with your friend; when he gets hold of a flea, he squeezes it on his fingerprint). Squeezing on a fingerprint means pressing between fingers in order to share with a friend. According to Kinene,
The idea is that it is appropriate for friends to help each other with everything, sharing their joys as well as their hardships. It does no good for one to wait until one has amassed enormous wealth to share with one’s friends, especially because wealth may never come. The man who gives three teaspoons of sugar to his friend every week is a better friend than one who gives fifty kilograms of sugar to his friend once. In other words, friends are to share even the little things, especially if they have struggled together. This idea applies to the way leaders treat their old comrades after entering office. Most of those who participated in the National Resistance Army war in the Luweero Triangle, for instance, have never received a proper reward for their efforts and the sacrifices they made for their country. Others no longer hold important positions in government even though many are still alive. Instead, they live desolate lives; the country they served has forgotten them. People need to remember those who struggled with them to achieve what they have.
5Kinene interview, December 16, 2019.By connecting exchanges between two acquaintances to the behavior of the president and other political leaders, Kinene strengthens the argument about the relationship between seemingly apolitical matters and overtly political ones. In this sense, friendship seems to be a universal principle that stretches across micro- and macropolitical realms.
In his analysis of “As He Plucked Them,” Edward Ssebunnya Kironde compares Kamaanya’s self-centeredness to that of Uganda’s current leaders. Expressing the opinions of the younger generation, Kironde states,
The song explores greed among leaders. Both Kamaanya and many current leaders of Uganda have a strong connection to war and conflict. By eating grasshoppers, the king is the only one who benefits from his actions. In contemporary Uganda, leaders mimic this selfishness. They constantly remind people of how they fought during the guerrilla war (Ugandan Bush War), and whenever someone questions the legitimacy of this claim, they pester the younger generation about whether their ancestors fought alongside the liberators. Overall, they might be the only ones who enjoy Uganda as “the pearl of Africa.”
6Kironde interview, December 19, 2019.By interrogating Kamaanya’s intentions, Kironde further explains that “self-centeredness drove the king’s decision to pull out the beards of the court musicians. The leader’s selfish actions only acknowledged his own dislike of beards while ignoring the effect his actions would have on others.”
7Ibid. Kironde then suggests parallels to that situation, explaining how some current leaders of Uganda, similar to Kamaanya, think only of their own lives when making decisions for their country.
Museveni fought and appeared as a messiah who saved Uganda, the country’s Moses. However, once in power, he was quick to turn into a pharaoh. He openly said he does not view himself as a servant to anybody and is answerable to none. The only people he works for are his grandchildren, having already acquired enough benefits for his sons and daughters throughout his rule. Even among other members of parliament, there is similar arrogance. Kahinda Otafiire, a military officer and minister of justice and constitutional affairs, is infamous for his arrogance and aggressive nature. Whenever people question his policies or views, he responds by arguing that he and others of his generation who fought in the bush war know what is best for Uganda, so no one should question them. Many leaders like him bury any opposition, believing that Uganda is their nation to rule, their nation to extort, simply because they fought in the war.
8Kironde interview, December 19, 2019.Kironde’s understanding of “As He Plucked Them” as an allegory of greed and selfishness in the present day shows us how the intentions of King Kamaanya match up with those of some twenty-first-century leaders and their sycophants. His Christian faith and knowledge of the Holy Bible allow him to connect the story of Moses and the pharaoh to that of President Museveni’s political agenda, suggesting furthermore that selfishness is a universal problem in political leadership.
Kibirige continues that ineffective leaders affect the livelihood of those they rule over. To combat the sorts of negligence of duty that take place in these situations, he not only points out the shortcomings of those who, as leaders, are supposed to represent the very best of what their people have to offer but also comments on the public ramifications of their actions.
Leaders, rather than feeling entitled to their positions, should recognize that their voters will not award them more time in office in the cases where they fail to plan or fully accomplish what they set out to do. The responsibility, therefore, falls on them to make the most of the time their voters allot to them. During that time, they should use their power to create more opportunities for themselves and the people, harnessing their connections at home and abroad to enact change. Though their efforts might not always be successful, the important thing is that they attempted to make a difference, as goes the saying, “Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you will land among the stars.” Some of the leaders of today, however, never even bother to try, which is a true disappointment to the people. The leaders cry for more grasshoppers, and the people shout back, “As he plucked them, he ate alone, the prince,” with eating alone signifying their greed. They do not recognize that eating everything within sight is not the way to solve hunger, for instance, because these are ongoing processes. Simply put, though one may have gorged oneself today, one will surely be hungry again tomorrow. The solution is to eat sparingly, to leave some food on the plate for the people.
9Kibirige interview, December 15, 2019.Kibirige’s opinions about leaders’ refusal to cooperate with their people highlight the importance of harnessing connections to enact change. Using eating alone as a metaphor for greed, he reimagines “As He Plucked Them” to fit current contexts. In the original story, plucking beards and eating grasshoppers might have little to do with greed, yet Kibirige’s position speaks to how one might reimagine the song for contemporary Uganda. By interpreting it differently, its meaning takes on new forms.
Kisuule expands on this allusion by explaining the relationship between cooperation and success. She identifies cooperation as a critical skill for today’s leaders:
When opportunities come up, it is unwise to be selfish and take them all for oneself. It is impossible to achieve cooperation when some people wish for themselves better than they do for others. People will not help someone who is unwilling to help them. In other words, they will not stay with that person through both the good and the bad unless they know that the person would do the same for them. This dynamic even manifests at the village level, where those who never attend the funerals of others’ family members are hard pressed to find anyone willing to attend the funerals of their own dear ones. The case is the same in higher politics. When leaders come down to hear the issues of their people, the people are unwilling to give them their support unless they are sure that the leaders will support them as well.
10Kisuule interview, December 21, 2019.Kisuule’s commentary on cooperation also reminds us of the extent to which one’s willingness to work with others and to reciprocate assistance drives one’s success. In fact, the commentary recalls how Kamaanya’s self-obsession led him to fail as a leader.
Kinene echoes Kisuule’s interpretation by discussing the importance of selflessness and gratitude:
These are two characteristics that both Kamaanya and the current political administration appear to lack. People often speak about selfish leaders as if they are gluttons. They unwisely and selfishly satisfy only themselves rather than sharing with their fellows as expected. They need to share with others what they have gained, hence the following Luganda proverbs:
Ono alya n’ono alya; ye mmere egenda (This person eats and the other one eats; so the food moves);
Ono aleeta n’ono aleeta; ye mmere ewera (This person brings and the other one brings; so the food is abundant). Another reason to share with one’s fellows is that a person who does not share what he has with others will not receive any good wishes or favors from them. When a person rewards a fellow but keeps the lion’s share for himself, for instance, the fellow will not wish that person well. They will only see that person for their selfish behavior.
11Kinene interview, December 16, 2019.Here, Kinene articulates the importance of generosity when engaging with others and suggests an association between greed and gluttony. By drawing on Kiganda proverbs to analyze the selfish tendencies of leaders, he happens to be pursuing an indigenous interpretive mode whereby he melds the meanings of the proverb and song. This process works to reify and strengthen the criticism of greed as a social evil with grave political consequences. Thus, Kinene’s interpretation is not simply a process of searching for and subsequently discovering meaning; instead, it is a process of creation where he can mix different ingredients to put a fresh spin on a timeless concept.
Steven Mukasa Kabugo also comments on selfishness by describing “As He Plucked Them” within the contemporary context of nepotism:
The song not only displays the selfishness of King Kamaanya but also suggests that those who are selfish are unlikely to receive help in dire circumstances, even from those closest to them. Potentially, an entire lineage or family could fail to find someone to bail them out of a difficult situation. People might laugh, saying, “As you plucked them, so you ate alone; I can’t give you mine.” This selfishness also extends to nepotism, which is common in Buganda and Uganda. Whenever someone comes into wealth, they look out for those they are related to first. This practice recalls the proverb,
K’ezaala; k’ekomberera (A cow licks her own calf). While looking after one’s own flesh and blood first is not necessarily a bad thing, the practice has broken up entire clans. The negative side of this arrangement is evident in another proverb:
Nnaasiwa mu kange, asiwa mu ka bukuku (One who says “I will brew beer in my own trough” brews it in a moldy one). This proverb describes someone who only wants to share his fortunes with those for whom he is directly responsible, such as his immediate family. He is totally unwilling to help anyone else, no matter how big or small their trouble is. Everything he earns goes to his family, regardless of whether they deserve it or not.
12Kabugo interview, December 19, 2019.Like Kinene, Kabugo uses Kiganda proverbs to expand on the themes of “As He Plucked Them,” but in this case he invokes and provides two perspectives on the concept of nepotism. Whereas the first proverb he presents simply describes how familial favoritism is prevalent in Uganda, the second one articulates the point at which this becomes nepotism, explaining that such behavior could result in one’s ruin. Again, proverbs add a new dimension to the song’s meaning, suggesting how multiple narratives can interlock to illuminate complex issues such as greed and selfishness.