Chapter 2
The Formation of the Hatmakers’ Fraternity
Amid the manoeuvres and mergers among London craft associations at the turn of the sixteenth century, a group of stranger hatmakers formed a guild. Given the labour circumstances of late fifteenth-century London, they presumably hoped thereby to gain a more secure position through collective representation to avoid the fate of other stranger artisans in the metropolitan region, unable to operate their own shops or hire servants according to the needs of their business. As non-citizens, the hatmakers could not form a guild through the usual structure of London civic authority (the mayor, aldermen, chamberlain, and Common Council), so instead they placed their association at least nominally under the authority of the bishop. The Fraternity’s home – the Dominican priory of the Blackfriars – may well also have been chosen specifically because Blackfriars was a liberty, a territory within London’s walls but outside the purview of the civic government.
The first part of this chapter will examine the early sixteenth-century Blackfriars precinct and the role it played as a space ‘in and yet not of the City’, as contemporaries put it,1 Shannon McSheffrey, Seeking Sanctuary: Crime, Mercy, and Politics in English Courts, 1400–1550 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), p. 61. allowing for exceptions to London’s restrictions on alien labour and retail. The second section will consider what the ordinances drawn up by the hatmakers tell us about the different practices of craft work and labour organisation in the Low Countries and England: when the Dutch hatmakers came to London, they brought with them assumptions about training, master-servant relations, and guild governance that diverged substantially from those held by their London counterparts.2 It should be noted that guild cultures were not homogenous in the Low Countries. On some distinctions between the southern and northern Low Countries in this period, see Wim Blockmans, Bert De Munck, and Peter Stabel, ‘Economic Vitality: Urbanisation, Regional Complementarity and European Interaction’, in City and Society in the Low Countries, 1100–1600, ed. Bruno Blondé, Marc Boone, and Anne-Laure Van Bruaene (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020), p. 51.
 
1      Shannon McSheffrey, Seeking Sanctuary: Crime, Mercy, and Politics in English Courts, 1400–1550 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), p. 61. »
2      It should be noted that guild cultures were not homogenous in the Low Countries. On some distinctions between the southern and northern Low Countries in this period, see Wim Blockmans, Bert De Munck, and Peter Stabel, ‘Economic Vitality: Urbanisation, Regional Complementarity and European Interaction’, in City and Society in the Low Countries, 1100–1600, ed. Bruno Blondé, Marc Boone, and Anne-Laure Van Bruaene (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020), p. 51. »