Selected Criticism, 1980–2025 (in chronological order)
Palencia-Roth, Michael, “Albrecht Dürer’s Melencolia I and Thomas Mann’s Doktor Faustus.” German Studies Review 3, no. 4 (1980): 361–75.
Detailed analysis of Dürer’s Melencolia I and the theme of melancholia more generally in Doctor Faustus. Argues that Mann deeply identified with Leverkühn, at least in the sense that he believed great art could only be created from a spirit of profound melancholy.
Cerf, Steven. “Love in Thomas Mann’s Doktor Faustus as an Imitatio Shaekespeari.” Comparative Literature Studies 18 (1981): 475–86.
Examines the numerous references to Shakespeare in Doctor Faustus and argues that each successive encounter with the Bard reflects a stage in the evolution of Leverkühn’s attitudes towards love.
Durrani, Osman. “Echo’s Reverberations: Notes on a Painful Incident in Thomas Mann’s Doktor Faustus.” German Life & Letters 37, no. 2 (1983): 125–34.
Provides a run-down of various literary and historical models that may have influenced the creation of Nepomuk Schneidewein and examines the ambiguous role he plays in the novel.
Ryan, Judith. “The Flowers of Evil: Thomas Mann’s Doctor Faustus.” In The Uncompleted Past: Postwar German Novels and the Third Reich, 42–55. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1983.
Analyzes Thomas Mann’s analysis of Nazism, positioning Doctor Faustus as a paradigmatic novel of exile. Connects it to a larger “turn towards myth” amongst novels of the early postwar period.
Lehnert, Herbert. “The Luther-Erasmus Constellation in Thomas Mann’s Doktor Faustus.” Michigan Germanic Studies 10 (1984): 142–58.
Maps the Luther-Erasmus dichotomy in Doctor Faustus onto various other facets of Mann’s cultural and intellectual formation. In the process, presents a highly readable synthesis of Mann’s intellectual origins. Defends Luther against his portrayal in the novel.
Durrani, Osman. “The Tearful Teacher: The Role of Serenus Zeitblom in Thomas Mann’s Doktor Faustus.” Modern Language Review 80, no. 3 (1985): 652–58.
Analyzes Zeitblom’s role as a narrator in Doctor Faustus. Ultimately takes a positive view of him, arguing that Zeitblom’s prose style is ideally attuned to its subject and that his ambivalences are no less indicative of the age in which he lives than is the fate of Leverkühn.
Roche, Mark W. “Laughter and Truth in Doktor Faustus: Nietzschean Structures in Mann’s Novel of Self-Cancellation.” Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literatur und Geistesgeschichte 60 (1986): 309–32.
Examines Doctor Faustus as a Nietzsche novel, paying special attention to Leverkühn’s characteristic laughter, which carries profound undertones in Nietzsche’s philosophy.
Vaget, Hans Rudolf. “Amazing Grace: Thomas Mann, Adorno, and the Faust Myth.” In Our “Faust”? Roots and Ramifications of a Modern German Myth, edited by Reinhold Grimm and Jost Hermand, 168–89. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1987.
Examines Leverkühn’s final composition, the Lamentation of Doctor Faustus, and argues that is an expression of Mann’s fundamentally hopeful and musically conservative worldview, as distinct from Adorno’s more pessimistic embrace of musical modernism.
Angress-Klüger, Ruth. “Jewish Characters in Thomas Mann’s Fiction.” In Horizonte: Festschrift für Herbert Lehnert zum 65. Geburtstag, edited by Hannelore Mundt, Egon Schwarz, and William J. Lillymann, 161–72. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 1990.
Examines Mann’s depiction of Jewish characters throughout his career and argues that he remained entangled in anti-Semitic stereotypes.
Scaff, Susanne von Rohr. “Unending Apocalypse: The Crisis of Musical Narrative in Mann’s Doktor Faustus.” Germanic Review 65 (1990): 30–39.
Examines the crisis of artistic production in which Leverkühn finds himself caught, arguing that his compositions up to the Apocalipsis illustrate the modernist “spatial form” described by literary theorist Frank Kermode.
Lehnert, Herbert, and Pfeiffer, Peter C., eds. Thomas Mann’s “Doctor Faustus”: A Novel at the Margins of Modernism. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1991.
Pathbreaking essay collection with contributions by almost all of the leading Mann scholars of the time. Contains essays on female and on Jewish characters in Doctor Faustus, on Mann’s views of Adorno and of Joyce, on the treatment of narcissism and of melancholia in the novel, and on Doctor Faustus’s influence on contemporary literature. Originally delivered as lectures, each essay is followed by a short and cogent response.
Robertson, Ritchie. “Accounting for History: Thomas Mann, Doktor Faustus.” In The German Novel of the 20th Century: Beyond Realism, edited by David Magley, 128–48. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1993.
Argues for Doctor Faustus as a novel that synthesizes realist, modernist, and mythic elements in an attempt to combat Mann’s fear of creating art that would be defeated by its own intellectualism. Points out that the novel elevates to the level of social analysis many elements that previous fictions by Mann had applied to the merely personal.
Eisenstein, Paul. “Leverkühn as Witness: The Holocaust in Thomas Mann’s Doktor Faustus.” The German Quarterly 70, no. 4 (1997): 325–46.
Applies psychoanalytic theories of Jacques Lacan and Slavoj Žižek to Doctor Faustus. Indicts Zeitblom’s attempts to read German history through the lense of the Faust-pact as an “attempt to save an ordering system in the face of the catastrophe that shatters it.” Argues that Leverkühn recognizes the fundamentally unsymbolizable dimension of murder and tries to bear witness to it through his music, thereby creating an opposition to Nazism.
Marx, Friedhelm. “Transfigurations of Christ in Thomas Mann.” Religion & Literature 33, no. 2 (2001): 22–36.
Examines the recurrence of Christ figures throughout Mann’s oeuvre, including in Doctor Faustus. One of the earliest example of a resurgence of interest in the religious dimensions of Mann’s arts over the past twenty-five years.
Cobley, Evelyn. “Avant-Garde Aesthetics and Fascist Politics: Thomas Mann’s Doctor Faustus and Theodor Adorno’s Philosophy of New Music.” New German Critique 86 (2002): 43–70.
A difficult essay, but perhaps the most important analysis of Mann’s debt to Adorno’s Philosophy of New Music available in English. Argues that the views of modernity and modern art articulated in Doctor Faustus are ultimately similar to those expressed by Adorno. (See the 2008 essay by Justice Krauss for a dissenting view.)
Cobley, Evelyn. “Ambivalence and Dialectics: Mann’s Doktor Faustus and Kleist’s “Über das Marionettentheater.” Seminar: a Journal of Germanic Studies 39, no. 1 (2003): 15–32.
Investigates the role that Kleist’s “On the Marionette Theater” plays in Doctor Faustus, arguing that Mann used it to illustrate a Hegelian, dialectical model of history that he had borrowed from Adorno.
Crawford, Karin L. “Exorcising the Devil from Thomas Mann’s Doktor Faustus.” The German Quarterly 76, no. 2 (2003): 168–82.
Revisionist study which argues that there is no devil’s pact in Doctor Faustus and thus, by extension, also no damnation of Germany. The true Faustus figure is instead Serenus Zeitblom, and Mann’s novel seeks to deliver a “message of compassionate love” emblematized by the relationship between narrator and protagonist.
Maar, Michael. “Teddy and Tommy: The Masks of Doctor Faustus.” New Left Review 20, no. 20 (2003): 113–30.
Examines the personal and emotional dimension of the collaboration between Mann and Adorno. Argues that in chapter XXV, the devil adopts the appearance not of Adorno but rather of Gustav Mahler, to whose works Mann scattered hitherto underappreciated hidden references throughout his novel.
Martin, Nicholas. “‘Ewig verbundene Geister’: Thomas Mann’s Re-engagement with Nietzsche, 1943–1947.” Oxford German Studies 34, no. 2 (2005): 197–203.
Concise yet detail-rich examination of Mann’s debts and allusions to Nietzsche both in Doctor Faustus and in his 1947 essay “Nietzsche’s Philosophy in the Light of Contemporary Events.”
Bahr, Ehrhard. “Evil Germany versus Good Germany: Thomas Mann’s Doctor Faustus.” In Weimar on the Pacific: German Exile Culture and the Crisis of Modernism, 242–64. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007.
Presents a highly readable summary of the composition history and the main themes of Doctor Faustus. Argues that the main significance of the novel lies in the fact that with it Mann overcame the originally Nietzschean (and therefore nineteenth-century) character of his art and fully turned to the problematic of modernism.
Jameson, Fredric, “Allegory and History: On Rereading Doktor Faustus.” In The Modernist Papers, 113–36. London: Verso, 2007.
Difficult yet immensely rewarding analysis of the four-fold allegorical structure in Doctor Faustus by America’s leading Marxist literary critic. Argues for Doctor Faustus as a novel illustrating the transition from high to late modernity.
McFarland, James. “Der Fall Faustus: Continuity and Displacement in Theodor Wiesengrund Adorno and Thomas Mann’s Californian Exile.” New German Critique 34, no. 1 (2007): 111–39.
Argues for 1945 as a “fulcrum” in the composition of Doctor Faustus, since in May of that year the Third Reich came to an end and in December Mann invited Adorno to collaborate on the description Leverkühn’s works. The end of the Reich simultaneously marked the end of the historical period in which Mann felt at home, and his invitation to Adorno signaled a corresponding shift in authorial agency.
Kraus, Justice. “Expression and Adorno’s Avant-Garde: The Composer in Doktor Faustus.” The German Quarterly 81, no. 2 (2008): 170–84.
Examines Mann’s intellectual relationship to Theodor W. Adorno, arguing (in a break from most other writings on the topic) that Mann preserved his independence from the philosopher and articulated a view of modern artistic expression that is substantially different from Adorno’s.
Ruehl, Martin, A. “A Master from Germany: Thomas Mann, Albrecht Dürer, and the Making of a National Icon.” Oxford German Studies 38, no. 1 (2009): 61–106.
Detailed discussion of Mann’s debt to Albrecht Dürer. Arguably the most extensive study of this topic available in English.
Elsaghe, Yahya. “‘La Rosenstiel’ and Her Ilk: Jewish Names in Thomas Mann.” Publications of the English Goethe Society 80, no. 1 (2009): 53–63.
Places Leverkühn’s admirer Kunigunde Rosenstiel in a long line of characters with markedly “Jewish” names that populate Mann’s fiction and examines how the author deployed such names with anti-Semitic intentions.
Kontje, Todd. Thomas Mann’s World: Empire, Race, and the Jewish Question. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2011.
Situates Mann within the context of nineteenth and early-twentieth-century imperialism, along with the attending racist and anti-Semitic prejudices. A nuanced discussion that points out the problematic aspects of Thomas Mann’s thought while also honoring his fundamentally cosmopolitan outlook.
Ziolkowski, Theodore. “Leverkühn’s Compositions and their Musical Realizations.” The Modern Language Review 107, no. 3 (2012): 837–56.
Provides descriptions of various real-life musical works that have been inspired by Leverkühn’s fictional compositions, including the soundtracks created for the 1982 film adaptation by Franz Seitz and the 2007 radio play by Leonhard Koppelmann.
Rütten, Thomas. “Genius and Degenerate? Thomas Mann’s Doctor Faustus and a Medical Discourse on Syphilis.” In Cotagionism and Contagious Diseases, ed. Thomas Rütten and Martina King, 147–66. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013.
Investigates the symbolic overtones of Leverkühn’s syphilitic infection, with particular reference to Paul Julius Möbius’s 1902 study On the Pathological in Nietzsche, which Mann likely consulted in preparation for the novel.
Eagles, Peter. “The Dunkelmänner of Doktor Faustus: Humanists versus Theologians,” German Life and Letters 75, no. 1 (2022): 98–115.
Examines the origins of the theological materials in Doctor Faustus, especially in the Halle chapters (XI–XIV). Argues that the sixteenth-century struggle between Catholic humanists and the more extreme voices of the Protestant reformation is reenacted in the novel.
Kontje, Todd. “Saul Fitelberg’s Failed Seduction: Worldliness in Doktor Faustus.” German Life and Letters 75, no. 1 (2022): 78–97.
Analyzes Mann’s problematic depiction of the Jewish character Saul Fitelberg in chapter XXXVII and connects it to Mann’s theory of cosmopolitanism as articulated in his radio addresses and other sources.